¢ Who were the survivors?
¢ How could they survive?
¢ What was difference between the lived and the died?
¢ Why did the young bachelors all die?
¢ Did the dead men really die naturally?
< Hypothesis >
¢Correlation between Family and survive(◎ )
▶ Most of 4 families are survived
▶ mutual protection ?
▶ The bachelors might have been killed?
¢Correlation between gender and survive( ○ )
▶ 2/3 Women survived…2/3 Men died
▶ Protection by men ?
▶ Women could avoid being killed?
¢Correlation between age and survive ( △ )
▶ 4 girls and 4 boys, aged 3 and under, died
▶ 6 boys, aged 4~16, died
▶ 2 girls, aged 4~16, survived
▶ Some of boys might have been killed?
¢Possibility of collusion ?
▶ 4 fathers of families survived.
▶ Why did young healthy bachelors die?
▶ But, Why were the dead-time s different?
<Methodology>
¢Using the database provided
¢Sorting the data
¢Assumption about the situation
¢Exclusion illogical assumptions
¢Restructuring the assumptions
¢Discussion & tentative conclusion
<Result> - attached table
<Hypothetic Conclusion>
☞ They ate the only dead bodies at the first time
☞ They might have colluded to kill
☞ Victims mainly were children and the old
☞ They might have evaded to kill families
☞ Young bachelors might have participated
the collusion at the first time.
☞ But, most of them might have become victims
later
☞ Some of them were dead naturally. (exception)
No comments:
Post a Comment